Finally, we have come to the end of this ridiculously long book. Honestly, this ending seems rather frantic and brief. In chapter 23, we see the narrator accidentally taking on yet another identity of a man he doesn't even know. Having been physically attacked and threatened, the narrator tries to disguise himself with glasses and whatnot but apparently becomes the spitting image of a man known around town as Rinehart. It seems to be only sketchy people who recognize the narrator by this name, which could suggest another aspect of the narrator's mysterious personality. Following suit with this new, underhanded identity, the narrator seems to be trying to undermine the Brotherhood yet again. However, this time he seems to think his grandfather's advice of merely agreeing with everything he Brotherhood says will do more for him than outright mocking and disproving the organization. Chapter 24 is more of the narrators underhanded attempt to destroy the Brotherhood by using the forgotten wives of the group members. This plan blows up in his face when he realizes the woman he is trying to seduce has her own agenda, but luckily for the narrator he gets saved by the bell, or the phone, when the Brotherhood calls him. It's strange that the organization would call him when they have become frustrated with him so many times before. In chapter 25 we see a creepy scene of the burning building as Ras chases the narrator through the building, calling for the narrator to be hung like the mannequins for being s traitor to the black race. The narrator attempts to speech his way out of death, but only digs a deeper hole for himself. However, the narrator escapes the building only to be chased by the cops, which causes him to fall down a drain and be covered by a man hole cover. He narrator has literally hit rock bottom. The epilogue contains self reflection of the narrator, wondering how he has ended up like he is, alone, underground and miserable. Honestly, I think he did this to himself. He thought he could crated a better life for himself out of his own peer and scheming. He interprets his life events and all turning sour because of his attempts to help.
What do you think about this self reflection? Do you think the narrator's life tuned out terribly because he tried to 'help' others?
It's been great doing this assignment with you, but I'm sure glad it's over!
Ruffy's Posts
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Friday, April 22, 2016
Invisible Man Entry #4
Alright so lots of weird stuff in this chunk of the book. In chapter 19 we have the weird scene of the narrator having an affair with a married white woman. She convinced him to come home with her, and not to just talk about women's rights. I honestly don't know how the woman's husband didn't see he narrator when he came in the roombtobaskbhisbwofe to wake him up early the next morning. The narrator is mortified and rushes away from the woman's house, telling himself he will never get into that position again. Also in chapter 19, the narrator is summoned by the brotherhood to an urgent meeting. The brotherhood has apparently lost momentum in Harlem and the brotherhood is pulling the narrator out of his job speakin about women's rights and wants him to speak and give the group popularity again. Kinda strange how hey call him when they are struggling.
In chapters 20 and 21, the narrator witnesses the murder of a man he knew, Clifton. The man had been selling and playing with his Sambo dolls, which depicted a racist stereotype of black slaves, always willing to say yes and being manipulated by strings. The narrator becomes angry about thre dolls and crushes one of them with his foot. Shortly after, Clifton is shot by the police. Quite shaken up, he narrator returns to his apartment and is visited by some younger brotherhood members. When he receives no answer on how the brotherhood will address this, the narrator arranges for a funeral and protest to take place. This is more prevalent in chapter 22. The brotherhood becomes angry with the narrator, citing that the narrator was not asked to be a part of the brotherhood to think, just to speak.
Do you think the narrator held the protest and made speeches because he truly cared about Clifton, or was he trying to take a stab at the brotherhood for not giving him what he wants? Can't wait to hear what you think!
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Invisible Man Entry #3
Welcome back to our favorite pastime. This was a large chunk of the book, so I am going to focus mainly on the chapters dealing with the Brotherhood and the narrator taking on a new identity. Our narrator never seemed to identify himself with any personality or identity other than being black and oppressed. I did not find it surprising how willingly he accepted the proposal to take on a new identity and leave behind his past life. Of course, his injury at the factory played a role in his willingness as he apparently had difficulty remembering details of his previous life. However, the narrator seemed unnaturally willing to wholeheartedly commit to this Brotherhood he knew so little about. After his initial disinterest in the group, he seems to join out of selfish motives, as he is being recognized for his ability to speak publicly. The man who persuades the narrator to join the Brotherhood says he "answered the people's appeal and [the Brotherhood wants] him to be the true interpreter of the people" (307). Do you think the narrator joins the Brotherhood because he agrees with the views of the group, or do you think he is just being selfish? But, our narrator cannot go too long without getting in some sort of trouble can he? He gets tricked into doing an interview for someone who is two-faced and uses the incident to attempt to get the narrator kicked out of the Brotherhood., but only succeeds in his being moved cities and becoming a spokesman for womens' rights instead of evictions. Do you think the narrator will put up with this move for very long? Why or why not? Can't wait to hear what you have to say!
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Invisible Man Entry #2
Welcome
back to your favorite activity of the week!
Since I accidentally included chapter three’s exciting details in my
last entry, I’m going to pick up in chapter four this time. So this Bledsoe guy seems to be a little sketchy
and fairly unforgiving as he quickly judges our mysterious narrator. After the excitement from the first three
chapters, our beloved narrator brings Mr. Norton back to his room, only to be
met with hostility from this Bledsoe guy.
Bledsoe chastises the narrator for bending to the wishes of Mr. Norton
and taking him to the slave living areas by saying they “take these white folks
where we want them to go, show them what we want them to see” (102). The narrator claims Bledsoe has been kind to him
in the past, but it seems interesting that he would advocate for only showing
the prominent white folks certain aspects of the black peoples’ lives, as if
trying to keep up the preconceived stereotype many white folks of the day most likely bought
into. Why do you think Bledsoe was so
adamant in his point of only letting the white folk, namely Mr. Norton, see
certain aspects of the slave life? Chapter
five is very insightful into the desires of the narrator’s heart. While hearing the chapel speaker, Reverend
Barbee, a chord is struck in the narrator’s heart about the founder of the
college and his story of overcoming violent beginnings, escaping slavery, learning
to read and write and ultimately founding this institution. Do you
think the narrator thinks of himself as a slave, even though he has a job? Chapter six is pretty strange as well. Bledsoe is still angry with the narrator for
taking Norton to the slave region, and admonishes him that he should have been
able to lie his way out of following Mr. Norton’s orders. Bledsoe threatens to
punish the narrator, but ends up sending him to New York for a summer to earn
his way back to school. The narrator
still seems to be passive and meek in the eyes of authority, which he remembers
his grandfather warned against on his deathbed.
Can’t wait to hear your responses!
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Invisible Man 1
This book is definitely going to be an interesting read. So much happened in the first three chapters I
barely know where to begin. In chapter
one, the narrator talks a lot about his grandparents and the change they
experienced after slavery of taking the mindset of being separate but
equal. It seems that the narrator
attempted to emulate his grandfather’s mannerisms, being passive and meek in
his community, namely with the white folks.
The narrator evidently thinks he is doing the will of his family, but is
shocked when he hears his grandfather speaking harshly to his father about being
too compliant to the whites and bending under the pressure to remain
different. The grandfather called on the
narrator’s father to undermine the agenda of the white folks and “agree ‘em to
death and destruction”. This phrase
could be referring to the Biblical death and destruction stemming from sins committed.
Perhaps the grandfather is warning his family to not sink to the level of the
whites and commit the same sins and let those who believe themselves to be so
righteous to fall from their own sins. The
narrator also relates of his strange acceptance to college. The fight scene didn’t make much sense to
me. I don’t understand why this would be
allowed to happen if these black boys were technically free. However, the narrator’s life seems to change
when he receives the bag with his acceptance letter in it, almost like a new
life was beginning for him.
The narrator’s tale about his job of
driving Mr. Norton around. The narrator
seems to regret taking this prestigious man to such dark places as the
Trueblood house, as he is despised by the community. Norton seems to go into a sort of trance as
he listens to the weird life story of this Jim Trueblood guy and offers him
money. The narrator becomes concerned
for Norton and attempts to take him to a bar to revive him with a drink. This Norton guy seems to be pretty touchy and
wimpy. Why do you think this wealthy,
prestigious man is so sensitive and willing to help Trueblood? And why do you
the narrator admires Norton so much?
Friday, February 5, 2016
"Death of a Salesman" Deconstructionist View
Many views of "Death of a Salesman" center around the decline of Willy through his job. Readers obtain glimpses of the beginnings of his decline in Willy's flashbacks and dreams. Often, in terms of relationships, that of father and son between Willy and Biff is examined for the tough love exhibited. However, how would this play change if the relationship between Happy and Willy is examined? In deconstructing this aspect of the play, readers may gain greater insight into why Happy seems to be more content with his life than his brother.
With much of the attention being focused on the star child Biff and his prospects after high school, Happy often gets swept under the rug and ignored. Although there is only a two year age difference between the boys, pressure is put in Biff by Willy to make something of himself while Willy hardly acknowledges the presence of Happy. Even in Willy's dreams and flashbacks Happy is no more than a supporting character, barely recognized as a son. Happy seeks some form of attention and keeps submitting "I'm losing weight, you notice, Pop?" (18). Every time Happy mentions something about himself, Willy turns right back to his assumed favorite son.
Happy seems to live up to his name even in the face of being cast aside. Never once does Happy comment harshly against his father and constantly is seeking to reconcile Biff and Willy in their strained relationship. Happy loves his father and looks up to him in his younger years, in Willy's dreams, and wants to protect him when the decline begins. Happy seems solely concerned with the well-being of his father, even if he is given no conscious attention. Biff acknowledges towards the end of he okay that his father had fed his ego in his childhood, which contributed to his later restlessness and inability to find contentment. Happy, however, has had to build himself up without the affirmation from his father, this lending him a greater sense of self worth, even if he is still searching for ultimate happiness.
With much of the attention being focused on the star child Biff and his prospects after high school, Happy often gets swept under the rug and ignored. Although there is only a two year age difference between the boys, pressure is put in Biff by Willy to make something of himself while Willy hardly acknowledges the presence of Happy. Even in Willy's dreams and flashbacks Happy is no more than a supporting character, barely recognized as a son. Happy seeks some form of attention and keeps submitting "I'm losing weight, you notice, Pop?" (18). Every time Happy mentions something about himself, Willy turns right back to his assumed favorite son.
Happy seems to live up to his name even in the face of being cast aside. Never once does Happy comment harshly against his father and constantly is seeking to reconcile Biff and Willy in their strained relationship. Happy loves his father and looks up to him in his younger years, in Willy's dreams, and wants to protect him when the decline begins. Happy seems solely concerned with the well-being of his father, even if he is given no conscious attention. Biff acknowledges towards the end of he okay that his father had fed his ego in his childhood, which contributed to his later restlessness and inability to find contentment. Happy, however, has had to build himself up without the affirmation from his father, this lending him a greater sense of self worth, even if he is still searching for ultimate happiness.
Thursday, January 28, 2016
From reading other posts and questions, I found it interesting that even within one family the American Dream can have many interpretations. Happy and Biff seem to think that a person attempting to achieve the American Dream works hard with little profit, even if it is what hey have always wished for. Willy on the other hand seems to think that the American Dream is the only means for satisfaction and that material objects will bring ultimate joy. Willy views the American Dream as being a goal for him to constantly be working towards, while his sons seem to think they have lived the Dream over and over again, achieved what they wanted, yet still feel empty and lonely.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)